<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote: Writing faster, easier, and more with computers (Berry)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2006/02/27/quote-writing-faster-easier-and-more-berry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2006/02/27/quote-writing-faster-easier-and-more-berry/</link>
	<description>A web site by Joshua Sowin that addresses culture, books, technology, ecology, religion, and other topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianna</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2006/02/27/quote-writing-faster-easier-and-more-berry/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2006/02/27/quote-writing-faster-easier-and-more-berry/#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>It looks like there is a misunderstanding in this text : the author is doing quite a lot to refute a reasoning which is not even correct. 

Of course our standards are not just &quot;to write faster, easier, and more&quot;; that&#039;s quite obvious. But using a computer, for a writer, is far from being just a matter of speed &amp; quanity. Many people find that writing in Word processor gives you a kind of freedom of expression which you could not enjoy writing by pencil. It involves another vision of text - you can split and extend, change, cut, paste, revert to a previous version or just delete the whole thing altogether more easily, and evaluation of the text is more immediate. 

That&#039;s different from paper-and-pencil method -- not because it is faster, but because it makes you pay more attention to the content, as you are no longer concentrated on the physical process of writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there is a misunderstanding in this text : the author is doing quite a lot to refute a reasoning which is not even correct. </p>
<p>Of course our standards are not just &#8220;to write faster, easier, and more&#8221;; that&#8217;s quite obvious. But using a computer, for a writer, is far from being just a matter of speed &#038; quanity. Many people find that writing in Word processor gives you a kind of freedom of expression which you could not enjoy writing by pencil. It involves another vision of text &#8211; you can split and extend, change, cut, paste, revert to a previous version or just delete the whole thing altogether more easily, and evaluation of the text is more immediate. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s different from paper-and-pencil method &#8212; not because it is faster, but because it makes you pay more attention to the content, as you are no longer concentrated on the physical process of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

