http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/07/12/science-cannot-prove-or-disprove-god-collins/ A web site by Joshua Sowin that addresses culture, books, technology, ecology, religion, and other topics. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:17:27 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/07/12/science-cannot-prove-or-disprove-god-collins/comment-page-1/#comment-94076 Anthony Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:31:36 +0000 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/07/12/science-cannot-prove-or-disprove-god-collins/#comment-94076 Science may not be able to prove god itself but science can prove gods "apparent actions" like the creation of life for example. Science may not be able to prove god itself but science can prove gods “apparent actions” like the creation of life for example.

]]> http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/07/12/science-cannot-prove-or-disprove-god-collins/comment-page-1/#comment-83850 kevin bear Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:07:27 +0000 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/07/12/science-cannot-prove-or-disprove-god-collins/#comment-83850 i had the same arguement with an athiest he said that i had no basis for this claim whatever that means. then i brought up paranormal experiences. then he said humans are not good eye witneses and are not perfect so witnessing something is not proof. well i said just because something doesnt have evidence does not diminish the fact that its there. he said that if he didnt have proof then there no reason for beliveing in something. then i said well if humans are prone to these mistakes like misinterpreting things and seeing things that arent there then science is also effected by this because science is conducted by humans. then i said if science cannot prove or disprove the paranormal or god it just means we dont understand it doesnt mean it doesnt exist. i had the same arguement with an athiest he said that i had no basis for this claim whatever that means. then i brought up paranormal experiences. then he said humans are not good eye witneses and are not perfect so witnessing something is not proof. well i said just because something doesnt have evidence does not diminish the fact that its there. he said that if he didnt have proof then there no reason for beliveing in something. then i said well if humans are prone to these mistakes like misinterpreting things and seeing things that arent there then science is also effected by this because science is conducted by humans. then i said if science cannot prove or disprove the paranormal or god it just means we dont understand it doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

]]>