Comments on: Our imperfect backbone (Miller) http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/ A web site by Joshua Sowin that addresses culture, books, technology, ecology, religion, and other topics. Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:11:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Garrett http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58626 Garrett Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:05:14 +0000 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58626 By that standard what parts of our bodies are not imperfect? Perhaps the intension of the Creator was to give us imperfect bodies, or for them to become imperfect from sin. By that standard what parts of our bodies are not imperfect? Perhaps the intension of the Creator was to give us imperfect bodies, or for them to become imperfect from sin.

]]> By: Garrett http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58623 Garrett Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:43:36 +0000 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58623 So through the course of evolving our backbones didn't keep up? So through the course of evolving our backbones didn’t keep up?

]]> By: Edman http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58444 Edman Tue, 25 Dec 2007 18:49:27 +0000 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58444 Actually, I think you missed the point, friend. Aging and dieing are not what is being discussed; what is being discussed is that our backbone is much better suited for an animal in a horizontal posture than one in the vertical posture. If we were spontaneously designed apart from "the animals," (which is certainly a claim of most Creationists, if not most ID proponents) then one evidence of this would be that we had a backbone <i>designed</i> for vertical posture. Actually, I think you missed the point, friend.

Aging and dieing are not what is being discussed; what is being discussed is that our backbone is much better suited for an animal in a horizontal posture than one in the vertical posture. If we were spontaneously designed apart from “the animals,” (which is certainly a claim of most Creationists, if not most ID proponents) then one evidence of this would be that we had a backbone designed for vertical posture.

]]> By: holmegm http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58191 holmegm Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:18:05 +0000 http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2007/12/22/our-imperfect-backbone-miller/#comment-58191 This is so incredibly beside the point. Hello: we age and *die*. Individual disagreements with our design are rather trivial in the big picture. Something that isn't exactly news, by the way. Yet these little presentations are made as though they were clever arguments. This is so incredibly beside the point.

Hello: we age and *die*. Individual disagreements with our design are rather trivial in the big picture.

Something that isn’t exactly news, by the way. Yet these little presentations are made as though they were clever arguments.

]]>