<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reducing income (Heath &#038; Potter)</title>
	<link>http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2008/01/09/reducing-income-heath-potter/</link>
	<description>A web site by Joshua Sowin that addresses culture, books, technology, ecology, religion, and other topics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2008/01/09/reducing-income-heath-potter/#comment-61171</link>
		<author>Eric Brown</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fireandknowledge.org/archives/2008/01/09/reducing-income-heath-potter/#comment-61171</guid>
		<description>Useless to what ends?  Not the end of greater self-sufficiency.  Not to the end of giving less support to the abuses of the corporate economy (fossil fuel depletion/pollution, Chinese labor situations, Walmart labor situations, destruction of farmland, etc., etc.)  There's a lot to be said for reducing (in dollar terms) consumption, even apart from income.

I guess I would agree with the authors, though, that there's a lot to be said for "reducing income," but not so much because of any corelation to consumption.  Living conscientiously cannot help but lead us to compromise other things, ill-gotten gain chief among them.  I think people really fail to see the impact of the work we do on the world.  The world is cared for/destroyed almost entirely by people "on the clock."  So long as our income-generating activities are exempt from thorough scrutiny of conscience, we are going to continue destroying the world (including people/communities) as mercenaries of the bottom-line-driven beast.

Saving can certainly help us a lot in opening up better options (i.e. better stewardship.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useless to what ends?  Not the end of greater self-sufficiency.  Not to the end of giving less support to the abuses of the corporate economy (fossil fuel depletion/pollution, Chinese labor situations, Walmart labor situations, destruction of farmland, etc., etc.)  There&#8217;s a lot to be said for reducing (in dollar terms) consumption, even apart from income.</p>
<p>I guess I would agree with the authors, though, that there&#8217;s a lot to be said for &#8220;reducing income,&#8221; but not so much because of any corelation to consumption.  Living conscientiously cannot help but lead us to compromise other things, ill-gotten gain chief among them.  I think people really fail to see the impact of the work we do on the world.  The world is cared for/destroyed almost entirely by people &#8220;on the clock.&#8221;  So long as our income-generating activities are exempt from thorough scrutiny of conscience, we are going to continue destroying the world (including people/communities) as mercenaries of the bottom-line-driven beast.</p>
<p>Saving can certainly help us a lot in opening up better options (i.e. better stewardship.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
