Why I Stopped Buying Books
February 17th, 2010 | Published in Books & Reading, Technology | 5 Comments
From 2004 to 2009, I spent most of my evening hours reading. I owned no tv to distract me. At first it was mostly theology and philosophy… until I got a taste for novels. I devoured the Dickens canon within a year. Next I dove into culture and came out a fiery neo-Luddite. Then I got into history, economics, and science. I left my fundamentalism behind and embraced evolution. Every book I read made an impact on how I thought and viewed the world.
I couldn’t understand why everyone didn’t spend their evenings reading — who wants to stare at a tv when you can have your life changed every day?
I was a compulsive book buyer for years, but recently I’ve found the joys of the local library. They have far more books in the county than I’d be able to own and — this I find amazing — it’s free, unless you count those pesky late fines. Still, I find two disadvantages to the library system: (1) you’re not allowed to write in them and (2) you only have them for a few weeks.
Here’s my confession: I write in library books. I can’t stop myself. But don’t worry Mrs. Librarian, I always use light pencil and I erase all traces of my graffiti. I don’t do it just for the thrill, though — I mark quotes. When I finish the book, I find the quotes, type them out, and erase my markings.
I don’t want to believe it’s just a loaned book. I like books that sit around for months and beg to be picked up and read. I don’t want to give them back in 7 or 14 days. And even though I became quick friends with the online renewal system, it only lets me renew three times (they set limits because of greedy people like me).
So the library doesn’t work for books I want to write in and have on hand for a long time. So should I buy them?
I used to. But unless it’s a book I’m extremely excited about, I’ve found myself not wanting to buy a paper version, even though I love paper books. They’re expensive, heavy, easily ruined, and take up a lot of space.
The truth is, I want a good e-reader. It’s only a matter of time before one exists. I’ve owned two editions of the Kindle, but sold them both. The terrible interface and control mechanisms (a joystick and noisy page turning button) ruined the experience. The iPad isn’t The One either — the screen is backlit and there isn’t a great way of marking books. The irony is using the Kindle app on the iPad is better than the Kindle itself.
I used to hate the idea of e-books. I thought paper was far superior and that it wouldn’t really catch on. That was naive. Eventually paper books will go the way of scrolls and stone tablets — of interest to collectors, but not to the rest of us. E-book readers (either as separate devices or integrated into mobile devices) will fit much better into our lifestyles and we’ll gradually move to them in the coming decades.
I think most of us know this intuitively as we watch how technology and culture is progressing. This isn’t a bad thing; it’s just different. There will be advantages and disadvantages, just like any technological revolution.
I’m still waiting to meet a good e-book reader. My compulsive book buying has been put on hold until I can buy them digitally to read on a device that I feel is a worthy alternative to a paper book.
And in the meantime, I’ll be a loyal — if not ideal — visitor to my local library.
February 17th, 2010 at 9:55 am (#)
I have to admit that I’ve renewed books 3 times before, brought it back to the library, and immediately re-requested it from the library, automatically reseting my 3 renewal limit.
The problem with collecting anything physical is storage. I experienced the same thing with music after going on music buying binge from 2002-2005. I found myself with about 1000 CDs after owning just 100-200 after college. I’ve since stopped purchasing hard copies of CDs in favor of MP3 albums. Some audiophiles will claim that the sound isn’t the same, but to be honest I’ve never been able to notice and now I don’t have to worry about storage issues (for the most part).
I agree that there’s a certain part of me that smugly states that I would never use an eReader because I “just love the feel and smell of paper,” but that’s equivalent to an audiophile saying they’ll only listen to records because that provides the best sound. Maybe it does, but a record player isn’t very portable and easily shared. In the same way, reading a physical book is nice, nostalgic even, but inaccurate to my actual reading habits. I already read most news, articles and other items on a screen – I think I just need to admit that to myself and embrace it.
February 17th, 2010 at 10:17 am (#)
Agree about there not being a worthy book replacement yet. DRM books are ridiculous and a waste of money. The Kindle felt like it was from the stone age even when it was the only thing out there (i.e., slightly above a stone tablet MAYBE).
The iPad direction is intriguing. It has note-taking functionality, and it will be interesting to see how that is developed.
February 18th, 2010 at 2:30 pm (#)
I like how the online ESV reference bible lets you attach “margin” notes to a particular verse or chapter. I made have heard of this feature already existing in e-readers, but they might need better text-entry options for it to catch on.
Josh, did you mean you have 5 bookcases of books? Or really just 5 shelves? Five shelves would be quite an amazing reduction!
February 18th, 2010 at 2:40 pm (#)
Er, yeah, bookcases. :)
February 20th, 2010 at 2:07 pm (#)
What about Nook from Barnes & Noble? It hasn’t come down here in Europe yet, and I wonder whether it would be a competitor to Kindle. The problem with iPad & other back-lit devices is that they kill your eyes, and your battery as well. Fine for 15 min scrolling, not 2 full hours comfortable reading,
I have a Kindle since a couple of months, and actually find it not so bad. And sometimes, while reading a paper book, I find myself whishing to clic in order to highlight a sentence or to touch a word to get its definition :)).